We paid for 82 weeks on this program, and now they are changing the rules. Because people are not coming they are making it that we have to re-sign up every twelve weeks, and if we don't show up then we are out of the program. There are a couple things wrong with that, first we had to pay for the program up front, so requiring that we sign another contract every 12 weeks just isn't right. Secondly, they won't enforce it just like they didn't enforce that we could only miss two classes in the first thirty weeks.
They knew the statistics when they started the program, so understanding that they want a higher success rate is one thing, but we are a test group, and they are changing the test in the middle? I mean it is no skin off my nose, I am committed to the program, and I was planning on attending for the full 82 weeks, so signing a piece of paper every twelve weeks doesn't bother me, but it isn't fair nonetheless.
So the signing of the paper was Tuesday, I am curious how many of those who signed will be there this coming Tuesday - I will let you know.
They knew the statistics when they started the program, so understanding that they want a higher success rate is one thing, but we are a test group, and they are changing the test in the middle? I mean it is no skin off my nose, I am committed to the program, and I was planning on attending for the full 82 weeks, so signing a piece of paper every twelve weeks doesn't bother me, but it isn't fair nonetheless.
So the signing of the paper was Tuesday, I am curious how many of those who signed will be there this coming Tuesday - I will let you know.
Sounds like Kaiser is not as happy with the program as they'd like.
ReplyDeleteT3's points are totally valid, but there's really not much she can do.
Interesting as to how I find out these things via her blog - maybe we need to hire an interpreter?
I'm with you. They need a new facilitator. Me.
ReplyDelete